167 views (last 30 days)

Show older comments

Meta threads have a tendency to grow large. This has happened several times before (the wishlist threads #1 #2 #3 #4 #5, and 'What frustrates you about MATLAB?' #1 and #2).

No wonder that a thread from early 2011 has also kept growing. After just under a decade there are (at time of writing) 119 answers, making the page slow to load and navigate (especially on mobile). So after a friendly nudge; here is a new thread for the things that are missing from Matlab.

Same question: are there things you think should be possible in Matlab, but aren't? What things are possible with software packages similar to Matlab that Matlab would benefit from? (note that you can also submit an enhancement request through support, although I suspect they will be monitoring activity on this thread as well)

What should you post where?

@anyone posting a new thread when the last one gets too large (about 50 answers seems a reasonable limit per thread), please update this list in all last threads. (if you don't have editing privileges, just post a comment asking someone to do the edit)

dpb
on 10 Sep 2020

Shae Morgan
on 31 Jul 2020

facet_wrap or facet_grid (or general ggplot2 functionality) version of subplots, or some altered, simpler customizability for subplotting subsets of data.

gramm is an available toolbox, but it'd be nice to have it built in

Rafael S.T. Vieira
on 31 Jul 2020

Edited: Rafael S.T. Vieira
on 31 Jul 2020

I would love to have a command TeX2sym and sym2TeX. With it, we could bring formulas from LaTeX and run them in MATLAB and the other way around. It is a tedious work doing it by hand, and I could bet most MATLAB users do it or will do it eventually.

Another useful feature to add would be arbitrary-precision arithmetic...languages such as python and Java (with Bignum), allows unlimited precision when dealing with integers at least. Granted that It is slow, but I believe that the MATLAB team could do something better. And I honestly feel like MATLAB is missing a feature by not having it...even some competing software has it.

And finally I was considering buying the Text Analytics Toolbox, and it would be nice, if it could have a grammar/spell checker. Even if it is not as advanced or doesn't contain all words. With live scripts, we can write an interactive document, so it would be nice if MATLAB could correct our spelling (even if it required a ToolBox to do it).

Rafael S.T. Vieira
on 1 Aug 2020

Thank you for your interest, Walter and Rik. I believe that It is best to teach ourselves to code in a particular way, which will allow MATLAB to convert it to sym, than to be doing the task by hand every time.

Operator precedence could take care some of these issues. If \sin x + y was the input, then left-to-right precedence could dictate the output to be sin(x) + y. And to obtain sin(x+y), we would have to code in LaTeX \sin{x+y} or \sin(x+y).

Implied multiplication is indeed very common in mathematics and latex. On the other hand, it is also almost ubiquitous that variables are written just as single letters (especially if we are writing implied multiplication).

Finally, a command like tex2sym does not need to contemplate every math package imho, just some set of commands and macros. MATLAB could even return its best guess, and let us do the remainder of the task. Of course, ideally, we would just copy the contents from environments like $$ and \[ ... \] and paste them into MATLAB for a tex2sym conversion.

Walter Roberson
on 13 Sep 2020

A "soft interrupt" -- that is, an interrupt that can be handled with try/catch .

For example I am running a long calculation at the moment that iterates several times, and each iteration can take more than an hour. I don't always have the patience to wait through as many iterations as I asked for. For my purposes, the output of the last successful iteration would be "good enough" if I were to ask to interrupt the function.

I can control-C, but that interrupts the function completely, losing all of the outputs, and losing the function variables.

If I could somehow "soft interrupt" and have it return the current values of all variables, then that would be good enough for my current task. But the generalization of that would be the ability to catch a soft interrupt in a try/catch so that the code could make whatever final summariziation it needed to in order to create usable output variables. Furthermore, even though my own routine might be happy to return the "last good" values of the output variables, any soft-interrupt I requested might well get received while some lower-level routine had control that did not know about soft-interrupts, so I would want interrupt (with no return values) to apply to those layers until control reached my handler for a clean run-down.

Sindar
on 3 Oct 2020

Tim
on 5 Nov 2020

The following changes to the internal volume renderer would make Matlab much more useful for volume visualization:

- True RGB volume visualization (vs. just scalar data + colormap)
- Independent, decoupled specification of alpha values and intensity values
- The ability to combine volume images with standard axes and axes objects like points, lines, patches, etc.

Mario Malic
on 13 Nov 2020

Mikhail
on 2 Aug 2020

Some (well, most) dynamic programming languages allow for an experienced developer to have an insight look into how their code is actually executed by the runtime environment.

They are able to see the parse tree and the compiled byte code.

They are able to see what parts of code are JIT-compiled, and how exactly the are compiled. When something is not compiled, they are able to see why.

The developer doesn't have to guess whether a particular optimization has kicked in or not. They know for sure how each and every object in their code is handled (whether it is CoW, passed by reference, passed by value).

I'd love to see these capabilities in MATLAB, too.

Seth Wagenman
on 31 Aug 2020

dpb
on 6 Sep 2020

Edited: dpb
on 6 Sep 2020

A ready-built insertion method for tables, arrays, etc., so don't have to do all the under-the-hood indexing manually...given an array of the right size and matching index, if had table (say), then

tMyTable=insert(tMyTable,indices,tNewData);

ideally, an option with keyword 'Empty', T|F would be available as well.

Maybe I'm missing some magic pixie dust, but I've been unable to figure out a way to this without physically moving a section at a time to insert the new row which means working from rear to front to avoid changing the indices to the insertion points or by catenating the pieces starting from the front.

dpb
on 6 Sep 2020

Yeah, that's undoubtedly a better way on the construction, Walter -- I hadn't really thought about the implementation too much other than going "dead ahead" to "just get 'er done!" for the immediate task at hand.

Taking a break, I thought I'd throw it out as an idea for an enhancement for discussion...with the sidelight maybe somebody did have a "trick" hadn't thought of.

Walter Roberson
on 9 Sep 2020

I know I've said it before, but it's still missing and still important:

We need a way to gather all of the outputs of function call into a cell in the middle of an expression .

I know this may be tricky to implement internally. There are internal rules that are hard to work out, that have to do with how many outputs to request from functions. For example,

[A, B] = cellfun(@C, D, 'uniform', 0)

somehow passes knowledge of "two outputs" to C -- for example if you were to use @max then A would be a cell array of the maxima and B would be a cell array of the indices. The situation can get more complicated than this, and figuring out all the cases can make your head hurt. But we do know that any expression C(D(E)) that D(E) will be evaluated asking for exactly one output and that would be passed into C... but the knowledge of multiple outputs would be passed to C and yet not D.

The number of outputs to use is not inherently clear. If for example you call ode45 and ask to gather the outputs, are you asking for the common TOUT, YOUT case, or the full TOUT,YOUT,TE,YE,IE ? There are some cases where extra outputs can be expensive to calculate, so even though an operation that gathered "maximum" outputs might be useful, it is not always desireable, so ability to select the number would be useful.

Then there are issues with, for example, deal(), where you can have any number of outputs with just a single input:

[A,B,C,D] = deal(123)

would initialize A, B, C, and D all to 123. So if you ask to gather "all" of the outputs from deal(123), that number is not well defined.

Working these things out is not trivial -- but it is a really missing bit of the language.

There might be an opportunity for a syntax such as {}name -- e.g.,

arrayfun(@(X0) {}ode45(@f, tspan, X0), x0s)

meaning to gather all of the outputs of the call. At present, {} is not valid before a name.

Walter Roberson
on 10 Sep 2020

Bruno,

Imagine that you want to implement

[temp{1:3}] = ndgrid(-1:.1:1);

C = cell2mat(cellfun(@(M) M(:), temp, 'uniform', 0);

That is, you want a single array in which each of the columns is one of the outputs of ndgrid(). And you want to do it as a single expression.

ndgrid() does not have a fixed number of outputs -- it is not like sin() with one fixed outputs, or max with two fixed outputs. nargout(@ndgrid) is -1 -- in other words the declaration is like

function varargout = ndgrid(varargin)

If you wanted to capture all of the outputs of max() then you could query ndgrid(@max) to get 2:

function outputs = gather_outputs(f, varargin)

n = nargout(f);

[outputs{1:n}] = f(varargin{:});

end

and you could

gather_outputs(@max, rand(3,5))

and this would be fine for gathering the two outputs of max into a single cell array.

But if we try to

gather_outputs(@deal, [])

then nargout(@deal) is -1 and if we said "Okay, take the absolute value of that -1" then we would be doing

[outputs{1:1}] = deal([])

which would give you just {[]} as the output.

This shows that you cannot just look at nargout() of the function you are invoking, such as @max or @deal .

Can we just look at nargout of the overall expression to determine the number of outputs to use for deal? No,

C = cell2mat(cellfun(@(M) M(:), gather_outputs(@ndgrid, -1:.1:1), 'uniform', 0));

would at best tell you that nargout is 1 (the C variable). You need something else to tell you the number of outputs you want to get -- something like

function outputs = gather_n_outputs(f, n, varargin)

[outputs{1:n}] = f(varargin{:});

end

and then you could

C = cell2mat(cellfun(@(M) M(:), gather_n_outputs(@ndgrid, 3, -1:.1:1), 'uniform', 0));

The request is to build this kind of facility in to MATLAB instead of having to write true functions like gather_n_outputs and have to pass function handles into them. Some syntax like

C = cell2mat(cellfun(@(M) M(:), {3}ndgrid(-1:.1:1), 'uniform',0));

where the hypothethical new syntax {3} indicates that you are requesting 3 outputs and that you want them gathered in a cell array. A common alternate syntax would be {} to request all of the outputs, like

C = cellfun(@(V) V.^2, {}max(rand(3,5)), 'uniform', 0)

which would hypothetically gather both (all) outputs of the max() call into a cell array that would then be available for further processing.

If you just used

C = cellfun(@(V) V.^2, max(rand(3,5)), 'uniform', 0)

then the knowledge of the single output would be carried through into the cellfun, which would tell max() to only emit a single output, so you would not get the second output processed. And the first output would be numeric not cell, so you would need arrayfun instead of cellfun...)

Walter Roberson
on 12 Oct 2020

A "select" clause for readtable() and kin.

For example one user only wanted to read the rows in which one particular variable had a particular value

It could at some point be implemented in terms of a rowfun() type function that got passed the variables for a row and could make arbitrary decisions based upon the row contents.

However an earlier stage could potentially have pairs of variable names (or numbers) and a vector or cell array of values, in which the selection code did an ismember(). Such a facility could be further improved if there were a "sorted" option (so the code could figure out when to give up looking -- any one value should no longer be looked for if a larger value were encountered). Or even "grouped", which would not imply sorted as such but would imply that when you find a value that all the instances of that value that exist will be in adjacent rows and so as soon as you detect a change you can know to give up looking for that value.

Sindar
on 5 Nov 2020

Ok, this is pretty minor, but:

For common functions that return values as the first output and indices as the second, it would be nice if there was a direct way of getting the indices, so I could do things like this:

x = [1 2 5 4 5];

y = 1:5;

y_xsorted = y(sortInd(x));

% or

y_xunique = y(unique(x,'ia'));

instead of needing to create temporary variables:

x = [1 2 5 4 3];

y = 1:5;

[~,idx] = sort(x);

y_xsorted = y(idx);

[~,idx] = unique(x);

y_xunique = y(idx);

I know I could make wrappers myself, but this seems like a case where a builtin function could potentially be noticeably optimized. (And, is more straightforward than rebuilding the whole output system)

Bruno Luong
on 6 Nov 2020

Bruno Luong
on 6 Nov 2020

Bruno Luong
on 17 Nov 2020

Edited: Bruno Luong
on 17 Nov 2020

No big deal but I wish SIGN(X) function could return 1 for X=0 instead of 0. May be implementing an option to not break the compatibility.

I just rarely use SIGN because of this exception choice.

Bruno Luong
on 18 Nov 2020

Why I prefer sign(0) = 1?

To me y = sign(x) should satisfy these two important properties

norm(y) = 1

x = y * abs(x)

This uniquely determines y for any x ~= 0 (real, complex or even quaternion). For x=0, any y=exp(1i*alpha) with alpha real meet both properties, so just select it as y=1 for arbitrary convention.

However the MATLAB SIGN() function does NOT satisfy the first property for x=0.

Adams's trick sign(x+realmin) is interesting, but it just shift the issue to x=-realmin.

cui
on 7 Feb 2021

Edited: per isakson
on 31 May 2021 at 20:47

Deep Learning toolbox:

How to visualize the changes in dlarray/weight distribution with histograms in deep learning?

Histogram displays how the trend of tensor (weight, bias, gradient, etc.) changes during the training process in the form of histogram. Developers can adjust the model structures accurately by having an in-depth understanding of the effect of each layer.

cui
on 9 Feb 2021

cui
on 7 Feb 2021

Edited: cui
on 8 Feb 2021

MATLAB

I very much hope that the official version will strengthen the readstruct function in the future! Lack of complete uniformity to support more format requirements.

cui
on 7 Feb 2021

Edited: cui
on 1 Apr 2021

Deep Learning toolbox:

- action recognition: mmaction2
- video understanding, X3D: https://github.com/facebookresearch/SlowFast ，https://github.com/kenshohara/3D-ResNets-PyTorch
- reID: https://github.com/JDAI-CV/fast-reid
- track: https://github.com/ZQPei/deep_sort_pytorch，https://votchallenge.net/challenges.html
- Metric Learning: https://github.com/KevinMusgrave/pytorch-metric-learning
- image Classification: Zen-NAS: A Zero-Shot NAS for High-Performance Deep Image Recognition
- object detection: Centernet, https://github.com/xingyizhou/CenterNet , efficientDet, https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientdet，detectron2，https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron2 ,PointRCNN,https://github.com/sshaoshuai/PointRCNN
- face recognition: insightface, https://github.com/deepinsight/insightface, sphereface,https://github.com/wy1iu/sphereface, arcface,https://github.com/ronghuaiyang/arcface-pytorch
- Semantic segmentation, instance segmentation，https://github.com/facebookresearch/maskrcnn-benchmark , Semantic Segmentation (Most of them are difficult to implement with matlab)
- deeplearning preprocess data: https://github.com/NVIDIA/DALI
- StyleGAN: https://github.com/NVlabs/stylegan
- DeepNetwork Architecture：Mnasnet，https://github.com/tensorflow/tpu/tree/master/models/official/mnasnet , Bayesian-Neural-Networks , Graph Convolutional Networks
- similarity search: https://github.com/facebookresearch/faiss
- deepfakes: https://github.com/deepfakes/faceswap
- deepnetwork inference performance: https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime ,https://github.com/zuoqing1988/ZQCNN
- image Labeler app: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/789159-how-does-image-labeler-app-realize-this-interactive-operation-by-writing-a-program?s_tid=srchtitle

and so on....

The above are influential applications of deep learning in various aspects, but it is difficult to reproduce in matlab. Although Matlab2019b version supports automatic differentiation mechanism, it is still difficult to implement algorithms in matlab. The efficiency of the differentiation mechanism is not high, and many operators do not support it. I tried to implement the more famous yolov3/v4 algorithm with the latest MATLAB2020a version, but it is still not satisfactory

In summary, my personal suggestions are like my personal answer above, and I hope that future versions can improve a lot!

以上都为深度学习在各个方面有影响力的应用，但是在matlab中复现困难，虽然Matlab2019b版本支持自动微分机制，但仍然不易在matlab实现算法，微分机制效率不高，很多operators也不支持。。。

总之，我的个人建议就像上面的个人回答建议一样，我希望将来的版本可以有所改善！

cui
on 19 Feb 2021

Deep Learning toolbox:

groupedConvolution2dLayer since R2019a support, but groupedConvolution3dLayer don't support ??? (until R2020b)

Camilo Andres Manrique Escobar
on 6 May 2021

Robert Guldi
on 29 May 2021 at 18:58

dpb
on 2 Jun 2021 at 15:50

OK, thanks for the hint -- I had thought that

borders=get(theCell, 'Borders');

theBorder=get(borders, 'Item', border);

set(theBorder,'LineStyle', style,'Weight',weight);

would have returned the wanted border Item object, but apparently not...I still don't fully understand that, but the following does work....

theBorder=borders.Item(whichBorder);

set(theBorder,'LineStyle', style,'Weight',weight);

although one apparently can't write

set(borders.Item(whichBorder),'LineStyle', style,'Weight',weight);

in typical MATLAB syntax fashion.

function SetBorder(sheetReference, ranges, whichBorder, weight, style)

if style==XlLineStyle.xlDouble, weight=XlBorderWeight.xlThick; end % only combination that works

if ischar(ranges), ranges=cellstr(ranges); end

if isenum(whichBorder), whichBorder=int32(whichBorder); end

if isenum(weight), weight=int32(weight); end

if isenum(style), style=int32(style); end

for i=1:numel(ranges)

try

range=sheetReference.Range(ranges{i});

borders=get(range, 'Borders');

theBorder=borders.Item(whichBorder);

set(theBorder,'LineStyle', style,'Weight',weight);

catch ME

fprintf('Error in function SetBorder.\nError Message:\n%s\n', ME.message)

%warning('Error in function SetBorder.\n%s', ME.message)

end

end

end

Experimentation also revealed that one can't use any combination of the enumerations (which limitation is also NOT documented). Only with the "Thick" weight is a double-line rendered; all the others are a single line of medium weight.

All kinds of things aren't documented and left for only trial and error to uncover...

The above could be cleaned up and forget about trying to use enumerations, but it's expedient for the moment and there are far more important issues to fix rather than continuing to throw time down the rat hole...

Thanks, you did get me pointed to what can be made to work--muchly appreciated!!

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!