Is the Abstract keyword needed to make a method abstract?

1 view (last 30 days)
Is this correct Matlab syntax
classdef MyClass
methods
outarg = my_method( this, inarg );
end
end
R2018b accepts it. Assuming this class definition is correct
  • is MyClass abstract?
  • is the method, my_method, abstract?
meta.class reports that .Abstract==false for both.
  1 Comment
per isakson
per isakson on 18 Sep 2021
Edited: per isakson on 18 Sep 2021
Addendum: "Run in R2021a" can't execute these lines in the question, since the class definition causes an error
meta_class = meta.class.fromName( 'MyClass' );
meta_class.Abstract
ans = logical
0
meta_class.MethodList(1).Name
ans = 'my_method'
meta_class.MethodList(1).Abstract
ans = logical
0

Sign in to comment.

Accepted Answer

Steven Lord
Steven Lord on 18 Sep 2021
That is valid syntax, but not for making my_method an Abstract method. What you've written tells MATLAB that my_method is implemented in a separate file, not in the classdef file for MyClass.
See this documentation page for more information on how to declare a method as Abstract.
classdef MyClass
methods (Abstract)
outarg = my_method( this, inarg );
end
end
  1 Comment
per isakson
per isakson on 18 Sep 2021
@Steven Lord, thank you for the answer. I had forgotten (I never use separate files).
However, that means that MyClass.m needs to be in a class folder named, @MyClass.

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (0)

Categories

Find more on Class Introspection and Metadata in Help Center and File Exchange

Products


Release

R2018b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!