prognosability
Measure of variability of condition indicators at failure
Syntax
Description
returns the prognosability of the lifetime data Y
= prognosability(X
)X
. Use
prognosability
as a measure of the variability of a feature at
failure based on the trajectories of the feature measured in several run-to-failure
experiments. A more prognosable feature has less variation at failure relative to the
range between its initial and final values. The values of Y
range from
0 to 1, where Y
is 1 if X
is perfectly prognosable
and 0 if X
is non-prognosable.
returns the prognosability of the lifetime data Y
= prognosability(X
,lifetimeVar
)X
using the lifetime
variable lifetimeVar
.
returns the prognosability of the lifetime data Y
= prognosability(X
,lifetimeVar
,dataVar
)X
using the data
variables specified by dataVar
.
returns the prognosability of the lifetime data Y
= prognosability(X
,lifetimeVar
,dataVar
,memberVar
)X
using the lifetime
variable lifetimeVar
, the data variables specified by
dataVar
, and the member variable
memberVar
.
estimates the prognosability with additional options specified by one or more
Y
= prognosability(___,Name,Value
)Name,Value
pair arguments. You can use this syntax with any of the
previous input-argument combinations.
prognosability(___)
with no output arguments plots a
bar chart of ranked prognosability values.
Examples
Input Arguments
Output Arguments
Limitations
When
X
is a tall table or tall timetable,prognosability
nevertheless loads the complete array into memory usinggather
. If the memory available is inadequate, thenprognosability
returns an error.
Algorithms
The computation of prognosability uses this formula:
where xj represents the vector of measurements of a feature on the jth system, variable M is the number of systems monitored, and Nj is the number of measurements on the jth system.
References
[1] Coble, J., and J. W. Hines. "Identifying Optimal Prognostic Parameters from Data: A Genetic Algorithms Approach." In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society. 2009.
[2] Coble, J. "Merging Data Sources to Predict Remaining Useful Life - An Automated Method to Identify Prognostics Parameters." Ph.D. Thesis. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 2010.
[3] Lei, Y. Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Rotating Machinery. Xi'an, China: Xi'an Jiaotong University Press, 2017.
[4] Lofti, S., J. B. Ali, E. Bechhoefer, and M. Benbouzid. "Wind turbine high-speed shaft bearings health prognosis through a spectral Kurtosis-derived indices and SVR." Applied Acoustics Vol. 120, 2017, pp. 1-8.
Version History
Introduced in R2018b