Statistics
RANK
186,212
of 300,908
REPUTATION
0
CONTRIBUTIONS
1 Question
4 Answers
ANSWER ACCEPTANCE
0.0%
VOTES RECEIVED
0
RANK
of 21,110
REPUTATION
N/A
AVERAGE RATING
0.00
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Files
DOWNLOADS
0
ALL TIME DOWNLOADS
0
RANK
of 171,639
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Problems
0 Solutions
SCORE
0
NUMBER OF BADGES
0
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Posts
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Public Channels
AVERAGE RATING
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Discussions
AVERAGE NO. OF LIKES
Feeds
Bug in BLE performance simulation
One other way for us to try to converge on this is for me to ask this: where did you come up with the formula snrVec = EbNo ...
5 years ago | 0
Bug in BLE performance simulation
What does "E" refer to in your formula? I think we're in agreement on what Eb/No means - it's a commonly used term in digital ...
5 years ago | 0
Bug in BLE performance simulation
I'm OK with the way you're handling sps (samples per symbol) in your simulation. You're using it to lower the SNR by 10*log(sps)...
5 years ago | 0
Bug in BLE performance simulation
Hi Deepak - The correct formula mapping Eb/N0 to SNR doesn't depend on the code rate per se. It depends on the ratio R of the ...
5 years ago | 0
Question
Bug in BLE performance simulation
I think there could be a bug in and around these two lines of this Matlab sim. codeRate = 1/2; snrVec = EbNo + 10...
5 years ago | 6 answers | 0
