Statistics
RANK
116,057
of 301,103
REPUTATION
0
CONTRIBUTIONS
1 Question
1 Answer
ANSWER ACCEPTANCE
0.0%
VOTES RECEIVED
0
RANK
of 21,170
REPUTATION
N/A
AVERAGE RATING
0.00
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Files
DOWNLOADS
0
ALL TIME DOWNLOADS
0
RANK
of 172,806
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Problems
0 Solutions
SCORE
0
NUMBER OF BADGES
0
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Posts
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Public Channels
AVERAGE RATING
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Discussions
AVERAGE NO. OF LIKES
Feeds
Answered
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Thanks for the reply. I agree with you that symmetry is important. But my problem is about the real values calculated from FFT. ...
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Thanks for the reply. I agree with you that symmetry is important. But my problem is about the real values calculated from FFT. ...
13 years ago | 0
Question
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Hi, I want to calculate the *real part* of fourier transform of A = exp(at) where "a" is a constant and t = [0 T]. when I calc...
13 years ago | 2 answers | 0
