Main Content

This example shows how to convert a problem from mathematical form into Optimization Toolbox™ solver syntax using the solver-based approach. While the problem is a linear program, the techniques apply to all solvers.

The variables and expressions in the problem represent a model of operating a chemical plant, from an example in Edgar and Himmelblau [1]. There are two videos that describe the problem.

Mathematical Modeling with Optimization, Part 1 shows the problem in pictorial form. It shows how to generate the mathematical expressions of Model Description from the picture.

Optimization Modeling, Part 2: Converting to Solver Form describes how to convert these mathematical expressions into Optimization Toolbox solver syntax. This video shows how to solve the problem, and how to interpret the results.

The remainder of this example is concerned solely with transforming the problem to solver syntax. The example closely follows the video Optimization Modeling, Part 2: Converting to Solver Form. The main difference between the video and the example is that this example shows how to use named variables, or index variables, which are similar to hash keys. This difference is in Combine Variables Into One Vector.

The video Mathematical Modeling with Optimization, Part 1 suggests that one way to convert a problem into mathematical form is to:

Get an overall idea of the problem

Identify the goal (maximizing or minimizing something)

Identify (name) variables

Identify constraints

Determine which variables you can control

Specify all quantities in mathematical notation

Check the model for completeness and correctness

For the meaning of the variables in this section, see the video Mathematical Modeling with Optimization, Part 1.

The optimization problem is to minimize the objective function, subject to all the other expressions as constraints.

The objective function is:

`0.002614 HPS + 0.0239 PP + 0.009825 EP`

.

The constraints are:

`2500`

≤ `P1`

≤
`6250`

`I1`

≤
`192,000`

`C`

≤
`62,000`

`I1 - HE1`

≤
`132,000`

```
I1 = LE1 + HE1 +
C
```

```
1359.8 I1 = 1267.8 HE1 + 1251.4 LE1 +
192 C + 3413 P1
```

`3000`

≤
`P2`

≤
`9000`

`I2`

≤
`244,000`

`LE2`

≤
`142,000`

```
I2 = LE2 +
HE2
```

```
1359.8 I2 = 1267.8 HE2 + 1251.4 LE2
+ 3413 P2
```

```
HPS = I1 + I2 +
BF1
```

```
HPS = C + MPS +
LPS
```

```
LPS = LE1 + LE2 +
BF2
```

```
MPS = HE1 + HE2 + BF1 -
BF2
```

`P1 + P2 + PP`

≥
`24,550`

`EP + PP`

≥
`12,000`

`MPS`

≥
`271,536`

`LPS`

≥
`100,623`

All variables are
positive.

To solve the optimization problem, take the following steps.

The steps are also shown in the video Optimization Modeling, Part 2: Converting to Solver Form.

To find the appropriate solver for this problem, consult the Optimization Decision Table. The table asks you to categorize your
problem by type of objective function and types of constraints. For this
problem, the objective function is linear, and the constraints are linear. The
decision table recommends using the `linprog`

solver.

As you see in Problems Handled by Optimization Toolbox Functions or the `linprog`

function reference page,
the `linprog`

solver solves problems of the form

$$\underset{x}{\mathrm{min}}{f}^{T}x\text{suchthat}\{\begin{array}{c}A\cdot x\le b,\\ Aeq\cdot x=beq,\\ lb\le x\le ub.\end{array}$$ | (1) |

*f*means a row vector of constants^{T}x*f*multiplying a column vector of variables*x*. In other words,*f*=^{T}x*f*(1)*x*(1) +*f*(2)*x*(2) + ... +*f*(*n*)*x*(*n*),where

*n*is the length of*f*.*A x*≤*b*represents linear inequalities.*A*is a*k*-by-*n*matrix, where*k*is the number of inequalities and*n*is the number of variables (size of*x*).*b*is a vector of length*k*. For more information, see Linear Inequality Constraints.*Aeq x*=*beq*represents linear equalities.*Aeq*is an*m*-by-*n*matrix, where*m*is the number of equalities and*n*is the number of variables (size of*x*).*beq*is a vector of length*m*. For more information, see Linear Equality Constraints.*lb*≤*x*≤*ub*means each element in the vector*x*must be greater than the corresponding element of*lb*, and must be smaller than the corresponding element of*ub*. For more information, see Bound Constraints.

The syntax of the `linprog`

solver, as shown in its
function reference page, is

[x fval] = linprog(f,A,b,Aeq,beq,lb,ub);

The inputs to the `linprog`

solver are the matrices and
vectors in Equation 1.

There are 16 variables in the equations of Model Description. Put these variables into one vector. The name of
the vector of variables is *x* in Equation 1. Decide on an order, and construct the
components of *x* out of the variables.

The following code constructs the vector using a cell array of names for the variables.

variables = {'I1','I2','HE1','HE2','LE1','LE2','C','BF1',... 'BF2','HPS','MPS','LPS','P1','P2','PP','EP'}; N = length(variables); % create variables for indexing for v = 1:N eval([variables{v},' = ', num2str(v),';']); end

Executing these commands creates the following named variables in your workspace:

These named variables represent index numbers for the components of
*x*. You do not have to create named variables. The video
Optimization Modeling, Part 2: Converting to Solver Form shows how
to solve the problem simply using the index numbers of the components of
*x*.

There are four variables with lower bounds, and six with upper bounds in the equations of Model Description. The lower bounds:

`P1`

≥
`2500`

`P2`

≥
`3000`

`MPS`

≥
`271,536`

`LPS`

≥
`100,623`

.

Also, all the variables are positive, which means they have a lower bound of zero.

Create the lower bound vector `lb`

as a vector of
`0`

, then add the four other lower bounds.

lb = zeros(size(variables)); lb([P1,P2,MPS,LPS]) = ... [2500,3000,271536,100623];

The variables with upper bounds are:

`P1`

≤
`6250`

`P2`

≤
`9000`

`I1`

≤
`192,000`

`I2`

≤
`244,000`

`C`

≤
`62,000`

`LE2`

≤
`142000`

.

Create the upper bound vector as a vector of `Inf`

, then add
the six upper bounds.

ub = Inf(size(variables)); ub([P1,P2,I1,I2,C,LE2]) = ... [6250,9000,192000,244000,62000,142000];

There are three linear inequalities in the equations of Model Description:

`I1 - HE1`

≤
`132,000`

`EP + PP`

≥
`12,000`

```
P1 + P2 +
PP
```

≥ `24,550`

.

In order to have the equations in the form *A x*≤*b*, put all the variables on the left side of the inequality. All
these equations already have that form. Ensure that each inequality is in
“less than” form by multiplying through by –1 wherever
appropriate:

`I1 - HE1`

≤
`132,000`

`-EP - PP`

≤ `-12,000`

```
-P1 - P2 -
PP
```

≤ `-24,550`

.

In your MATLAB^{®} workspace, create the `A`

matrix as a 3-by-16
zero matrix, corresponding to 3 linear inequalities in 16 variables. Create the
`b`

vector with three components.

A = zeros(3,16); A(1,I1) = 1; A(1,HE1) = -1; b(1) = 132000; A(2,EP) = -1; A(2,PP) = -1; b(2) = -12000; A(3,[P1,P2,PP]) = [-1,-1,-1]; b(3) = -24550;

There are eight linear equations in the equations of Model Description:

`I2 = LE2 + HE2`

```
LPS =
LE1 + LE2 + BF2
```

```
HPS = I1 + I2 +
BF1
```

```
HPS = C + MPS +
LPS
```

```
I1 = LE1 + HE1 +
C
```

```
MPS = HE1 + HE2 + BF1 -
BF2
```

```
1359.8 I1 = 1267.8 HE1 + 1251.4
LE1 + 192 C + 3413 P1
```

```
1359.8 I2 =
1267.8 HE2 + 1251.4 LE2 + 3413 P2
```

.

In order to have the equations in the form *Aeq x*=*beq*, put all the variables on one side of the equation. The
equations become:

`LE2 + HE2 - I2 = 0`

```
LE1
+ LE2 + BF2 - LPS = 0
```

```
I1 + I2 + BF1
- HPS = 0
```

```
C + MPS + LPS - HPS =
0
```

```
LE1 + HE1 + C - I1 =
0
```

```
HE1 + HE2 + BF1 - BF2 - MPS =
0
```

```
1267.8 HE1 + 1251.4 LE1 + 192 C +
3413 P1 - 1359.8 I1 = 0
```

```
1267.8 HE2 +
1251.4 LE2 + 3413 P2 - 1359.8 I2 = 0
```

.

Now write the `Aeq`

matrix and `beq`

vector
corresponding to these equations. In your MATLAB workspace, create the `Aeq`

matrix as an 8-by-16
zero matrix, corresponding to 8 linear equations in 16 variables. Create the
`beq`

vector with eight components, all zero.

Aeq = zeros(8,16); beq = zeros(8,1); Aeq(1,[LE2,HE2,I2]) = [1,1,-1]; Aeq(2,[LE1,LE2,BF2,LPS]) = [1,1,1,-1]; Aeq(3,[I1,I2,BF1,HPS]) = [1,1,1,-1]; Aeq(4,[C,MPS,LPS,HPS]) = [1,1,1,-1]; Aeq(5,[LE1,HE1,C,I1]) = [1,1,1,-1]; Aeq(6,[HE1,HE2,BF1,BF2,MPS]) = [1,1,1,-1,-1]; Aeq(7,[HE1,LE1,C,P1,I1]) = [1267.8,1251.4,192,3413,-1359.8]; Aeq(8,[HE2,LE2,P2,I2]) = [1267.8,1251.4,3413,-1359.8];

The objective function is

*f ^{T}x* =

`0.002614 HPS + 0.0239 PP + 0.009825 EP`

.Write this expression as a vector `f`

of multipliers of the
*x* vector:

f = zeros(size(variables)); f([HPS PP EP]) = [0.002614 0.0239 0.009825];

You now have inputs required by the `linprog`

solver. Call
the solver and print the outputs in formatted form:

options = optimoptions('linprog','Algorithm','dual-simplex'); [x fval] = linprog(f,A,b,Aeq,beq,lb,ub,options); for d = 1:N fprintf('%12.2f \t%s\n',x(d),variables{d}) end fval

The result:

Optimal solution found. 136328.74 I1 244000.00 I2 128159.00 HE1 143377.00 HE2 0.00 LE1 100623.00 LE2 8169.74 C 0.00 BF1 0.00 BF2 380328.74 HPS 271536.00 MPS 100623.00 LPS 6250.00 P1 7060.71 P2 11239.29 PP 760.71 EP fval = 1.2703e+03

The `fval`

output gives the smallest value of the objective
function at any feasible point.

The solution vector `x`

is the point where the objective
function has the smallest value. Notice that:

`BF1`

,`BF2`

, and`LE1`

are`0`

, their lower bounds.`I2`

is`244,000`

, its upper bound.The nonzero components of the

`f`

vector are`HPS`

—`380,328.74`

`PP`

—`11,239.29`

`EP`

—`760.71`

The video Optimization Modeling, Part 2: Converting to Solver Form gives interpretations of these characteristics in terms of the original problem.

[1] Edgar, Thomas F., and David M. Himmelblau.
*Optimization of Chemical Processes.* McGraw-Hill, New
York, 1988.