z =

# find a zero of a two-variable function

29 views (last 30 days)

Show older comments

my main.m is:

clear

clc

close all

%

X0 = [9.609 , 32.288]; %initial value close to zero of function

%

f = Trajectory(X0);

The script Trajectory.m is a messy think that returns a value of f. I want to find values of tht two input variables (X0) is the initial vbalues that give f=0

##### 8 Comments

Sam Chak
on 21 Apr 2024

Is 'Trajectory' a script or a function? If it is a function, what is the output of the function?

function output = Trajectory()

output = ...;

end

### Answers (3)

Bruno Luong
on 20 Apr 2024

Edited: Bruno Luong
on 20 Apr 2024

If you are not unlucky

Trajectory = @(x) sum(x.^2,2)-34^2-1; % Test function, use use rather own

X0 = [9.609 , 32.288]; %initial value close to zero of function

f1 = @(dx1) Trajectory(X0+[dx1 0]);

dx1 = fzero(f1,0);

X = X0+[dx1 0];

disp(X)

Trajectory(X)

fimplicit(@(x,y) Trajectory([x(:) y(:)]).')

hold on

plot(X(1),X(2),'or')

##### 2 Comments

Bruno Luong
on 20 Apr 2024

Edited: Bruno Luong
on 20 Apr 2024

As I said I gave a simple Trajectory as example, you don't have to use it but plug in your complicated code.on this

X0 = [9.609 , 32.288]; %initial value close to zero of function

f1 = @(dx1) Trajectory(X0+[dx1 0]);

dx1 = fzero(f1,0);

X = X0+[dx1 0];

Trajectory(X)

disp(X)

John D'Errico
on 20 Apr 2024

A two variable function is a surface. (@Sam Chak said this, but did not take the idea to the point of completion.)

But if a surface has any solution, where it becomes zero, then almost always it will have infinitely many solutions. In fact, the tool which draws the zeros of such a function is usually called contour. That is, you want to effectively find a contour plot.

Yes, a contour plot usually is drawn with many contours at different levels, but a contour plot is what you want, all the same. You want to see only ONE contour drawn, at z == 0. Again, a contour plot can be thought of as the set of values (x,y), suze that z(x,y) is a level surface, so z(x,y) is equal to some given constant, here zero.

For an example, I'll use a symbolic function, as there are nice tools we can use. But a function handle will also work, or just an m-file. ANY function of two independent variables will work. Of course, you want it to be a continuous function, as if not, things will get very messy.

syms x y

z = x^3 - y^3 + x^2*y^2 - 3

again, we cannot simply solve for a zero of that function, as there will be infintiely many such zeros, if any exist. We might do this:

H = fcontour(z);

H.LevelList = 0;

grid on

The curve drawn in cyan is the locus of points that solve the problem z(x,y)==0, so the level set of z, at z==0. As I said, not one solution. The problem is, a tool like fsolve will produce only one solution, it will not understand there are infinitely many such solutions, just finding only one point on one of those curves, and the solution it does find will be a function of the starting value you give it.

And of course, finding the "equation" of those curves here will be a very complicated looking thing, and that is for a rather simple problem to write. We can actually find at least a set of points that will approximate those curves, using the contourc function.

So what is it you want to see? Just a plot of the solutions? Then use tools like fcontour, or contour. I could also have used fimplicit. If your goal is a set of solutions, then we could use contourc. For example...

Xv = linspace(-5,5);

Yv = linspace(-5,5);

[X,Y] = meshgrid(Xv,Yv);

% Note my careful use of the dotted operators here to vectorize the code

% and make it properly evaluated for arrays X and Y.

zfun = @(x,y) x.^3 - y.^3 + x.^2.*y.^2 - 3;

Z = zfun(X,Y);

xy = contourc(Xv,Yv,Z,[0 0])

These are the solutions, split into two curves. Unfortunately contourc puts them into one array. Looking at the first column, we see [0;64]. That tells us the first contour had z==0, and there were 64 points found on that curve. The second branch of solutions had 146 points on it that were found.

So, if you want a set of solutions, then the simple approach is to use contourc. If you want only a plot, then just use one of the contour plotting tools.

##### 6 Comments

Bruno Luong
on 20 Apr 2024

Moved: Bruno Luong
on 22 Apr 2024

@Douw Gerbrand If your objective function f is pd quadratic form of 2 variable X, then I believe you should minimize f rather than solve for f = 0.

Also if you use MATLAB ode solver, be careful that it can be an issue of optimizing parameters, see an example here : https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/2105041-using-fmincon-to-solve-objective-function-in-integral-form?s_tid=srchtitle

If you have only 2 parameters to estimate you could use fminsearch.

##### 2 Comments

Bruno Luong
on 21 Apr 2024

Moved: Bruno Luong
on 22 Apr 2024

Try

X0 = [9.609 , 32.288]; %initial value close to zero of function

X = fminsearch(@(X)Trajectory(X),X0);

% or alternatively a simpler

X = fminsearch(@Trajectory,X0);

Or if it throw an error, please explain us at least the declaration signature of Trajectory and what does it suppose to do precisely with the input/output arguments.

### See Also

### Categories

### Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!