You are now following this question
- You will see updates in your followed content feed.
- You may receive emails, depending on your communication preferences.
How to plot parametric equations by using "for loop"
2 views (last 30 days)
Show older comments
If we have,
t= linspace (-30,-1.6);
X= ((3*t)./(1+t.^3);
Y= ((3*t.^2)./(1+t.^3));
plot(X,Y);
How we plot X and Y by using for loop?
18 Comments
Wajahat
on 18 May 2017
Actually, i want to plot a matrix equations. To plot matrix equations we use for loop.
Wajahat
on 18 May 2017
Edited: Guillaume
on 18 May 2017
t= linspace (-30,-1.6);
q=linspace (-30,-1.6);
X= ((3*i*t)./(1+t.^3);
Y= ((3*i*t.^2)./(1+t.^3));
a=[X Y; -Y X];
b=[X Y; -conj(Y) conj(X)];
c=[X X; -Y Y];
q1=q-(det(a)./det(b));
u1=-(det(c)./det(b));
plot(q1,u1)
now we have matrix a, b and c. How we plot it using for loop?
KSSV
on 18 May 2017
This gives error because, det exists for square matrices...in this a is not square matrix.
Rik
on 18 May 2017
a is not square with the above code, it is 2x200.
And when you want to plot something, it is at least as important to think about how you want to plot as what you want to plot. What do you want to be on what axis? Do you want to show more information using marker sizes or colors?
With a, b and c, you could make a 3D scatter plot (or surface plot) with the values in a, b and c as the x, y and z values. Is that what you want?
Wajahat
on 18 May 2017
without using for loop, it gives error (i.e. one of the matrix would not be a square), my question is, how to plot parametric equations with for loop?
KSSV
on 18 May 2017
And I would like to point put that determinant of a=[X Y; -Y X] would be always zero, even though you make it a square. We cannot help you unless your question is clear.
Guillaume
on 18 May 2017
Wajahat, We really have no idea what it is you're asking. You started with:
if we have [parametric equation and code that plots it given], how we plot X and Y by using for loop?
To which you were told: It's already working, why do you want to use a loop?
You then changed your question to say that you had a matrix instead. Again, said you needed to use a loop without explaining why. When asked why you wanted to use a loop, you gave some code that did not even work.
You've now changed your question again back to the original question. Our answer is still the same: It's already working, why do you want to use a loop?
We have no idea why you insist on using a loop. You haven't showed us why a loop is needed and we have no idea what it is you want looping over.
Wajahat
on 19 May 2017
Edited: Wajahat
on 19 May 2017
Guillaume, i have written a code (below) in which a matrices a and b are involved and get the plot of a solution q1 by using loop.
clear all;
close all;
x=-10:.1:10;
t=-10:.1:10;
q=.2;
mu1=4-.3*i;
mu2=.3+i;
for k=1:length(x)
for l=1:length(t)
x11=exp(i.*x(k)./(2*mu1)).*exp(-i.*mu1.*t(l)./2);
x21=exp(i.*x(k)./(2*mu2)).*exp(-i.*mu2.*t(l)./2);
y11=exp(-i.*x(k)./(2*mu1)).*exp(i.*mu1.*t(l)./2);
y21=exp(-i.*x(k)./(2*mu2)).*exp(i.*mu2.*t(l)./2);
a=[y11 y21; mu1.*x11 mu2.*x21];
b=[x11 x21; y11 y21];
q1(l,k)=q-(det(a)./det(b));
end
end
surf(x,t,abs(q1));
This is a plot of q1, where a and b are square matrices.
Now i write another solution i.e.
u1=-(det(c)./det(b));
where c=[x11 x21; mu2.*y11 mu1.*y21];
and plot a parametric curve between q1 and u1 (i.e. plot(q1,u1)). How can we do it by using loop? If we don't use loop then the dimension of the matrices does'nt match, i.e. one of the matrix would not be a square.
KSSV
on 19 May 2017
Still, there is something missing....First change your above code following: Replace i with 1i, and preallocate q1.
q1 = zeros(length(x),length(t)) ;
Now coming to a,b,c which are
a=[X Y; -Y X];
b=[X Y; -conj(Y) conj(X)];
c=[X X; -Y Y];
You can make them a square matrix, using meshgrid to X,Y. But the determinants of them would be zero.
KSSV
on 19 May 2017
clear all;
close all;
x=-10:.1:10;
t=-10:.1:10;
q=.2;
mu1=4-.3*1i;
mu2=.3+1i;
q1 = zeros(length(x),length(t)) ;
for k=1:length(x)
for l=1:length(t)
x11=exp(1i.*x(k)./(2*mu1)).*exp(-1i.*mu1.*t(l)./2);
x21=exp(1i.*x(k)./(2*mu2)).*exp(-1i.*mu2.*t(l)./2);
y11=exp(-1i.*x(k)./(2*mu1)).*exp(1i.*mu1.*t(l)./2);
y21=exp(-1i.*x(k)./(2*mu2)).*exp(1i.*mu2.*t(l)./2);
a=[y11 y21; mu1.*x11 mu2.*x21];
b=[x11 x21; y11 y21];
q1(l,k)=q-(det(a)./det(b));
end
end
surf(x,t,abs(q1));
Wajahat
on 19 May 2017
KSSV, why we replace i with 1i, and preallocate q1. what is the reason behind it?
Answers (0)
See Also
Tags
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!An Error Occurred
Unable to complete the action because of changes made to the page. Reload the page to see its updated state.
Select a Web Site
Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: .
You can also select a web site from the following list
How to Get Best Site Performance
Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.
Americas
- América Latina (Español)
- Canada (English)
- United States (English)
Europe
- Belgium (English)
- Denmark (English)
- Deutschland (Deutsch)
- España (Español)
- Finland (English)
- France (Français)
- Ireland (English)
- Italia (Italiano)
- Luxembourg (English)
- Netherlands (English)
- Norway (English)
- Österreich (Deutsch)
- Portugal (English)
- Sweden (English)
- Switzerland
- United Kingdom(English)
Asia Pacific
- Australia (English)
- India (English)
- New Zealand (English)
- 中国
- 日本Japanese (日本語)
- 한국Korean (한국어)