ans = 
Results for
In a recent blog post, @Guy Rouleau writes about the new Simulink Copilot Beta. Sign ups are on the Copilot Beta page below. Let him know what you think.
Guy's Blog Post - https://blogs.mathworks.com/simulink/2025/12/01/a-copilot-for-simulink/
Simulink Copilot Beta - https://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink-copilot.html
% Recreation of Saturn photo
figure('Color', 'k', 'Position', [100, 100, 800, 800]);
ax = axes('Color', 'k', 'XColor', 'none', 'YColor', 'none', 'ZColor', 'none');
hold on;
% Create the planet sphere
[x, y, z] = sphere(150);
% Saturn colors - pale yellow/cream gradient
saturn_radius = 1;
% Create color data based on latitude for gradient effect
lat = asin(z);
color_data = rescale(lat, 0.3, 0.9);
% Plot Saturn with smooth shading
planet = surf(x*saturn_radius, y*saturn_radius, z*saturn_radius, ...
color_data, ...
'EdgeColor', 'none', ...
'FaceColor', 'interp', ...
'FaceLighting', 'gouraud', ...
'AmbientStrength', 0.3, ...
'DiffuseStrength', 0.6, ...
'SpecularStrength', 0.1);
% Use a cream/pale yellow colormap for Saturn
cream_map = [linspace(0.4, 0.95, 256)', ...
linspace(0.35, 0.9, 256)', ...
linspace(0.2, 0.7, 256)'];
colormap(cream_map);
% Create the ring system
n_points = 300;
theta = linspace(0, 2*pi, n_points);
% Define ring structure (inner radius, outer radius, brightness)
rings = [
1.2, 1.4, 0.7; % Inner ring
1.45, 1.65, 0.8; % A ring
1.7, 1.85, 0.5; % Cassini division (darker)
1.9, 2.3, 0.9; % B ring (brightest)
2.35, 2.5, 0.6; % C ring
2.55, 2.8, 0.4; % Outer rings (fainter)
];
% Create rings as patches
for i = 1:size(rings, 1)
r_inner = rings(i, 1);
r_outer = rings(i, 2);
brightness = rings(i, 3);
% Create ring coordinates
x_inner = r_inner * cos(theta);
y_inner = r_inner * sin(theta);
x_outer = r_outer * cos(theta);
y_outer = r_outer * sin(theta);
% Front side of rings
ring_x = [x_inner, fliplr(x_outer)];
ring_y = [y_inner, fliplr(y_outer)];
ring_z = zeros(size(ring_x));
% Color based on brightness
ring_color = brightness * [0.9, 0.85, 0.7];
fill3(ring_x, ring_y, ring_z, ring_color, ...
'EdgeColor', 'none', ...
'FaceAlpha', 0.7, ...
'FaceLighting', 'gouraud', ...
'AmbientStrength', 0.5);
end
% Add some texture/gaps in the rings using scatter
n_particles = 3000;
r_particles = 1.2 + rand(1, n_particles) * 1.6;
theta_particles = rand(1, n_particles) * 2 * pi;
x_particles = r_particles .* cos(theta_particles);
y_particles = r_particles .* sin(theta_particles);
z_particles = (rand(1, n_particles) - 0.5) * 0.02;
% Vary particle brightness
particle_colors = repmat([0.8, 0.75, 0.6], n_particles, 1) .* ...
(0.5 + 0.5*rand(n_particles, 1));
scatter3(x_particles, y_particles, z_particles, 1, particle_colors, ...
'filled', 'MarkerFaceAlpha', 0.3);
% Add dramatic outer halo effect - multiple layers extending far out
n_glow = 20;
for i = 1:n_glow
glow_radius = 1 + i*0.35; % Extend much farther
alpha_val = 0.08 / sqrt(i); % More visible, slower falloff
% Color gradient from cream to blue/purple at outer edges
if i <= 8
glow_color = [0.9, 0.85, 0.7]; % Warm cream/yellow
else
% Gradually shift to cooler colors
mix = (i - 8) / (n_glow - 8);
glow_color = (1-mix)*[0.9, 0.85, 0.7] + mix*[0.6, 0.65, 0.85];
end
surf(x*glow_radius, y*glow_radius, z*glow_radius, ...
ones(size(x)), ...
'EdgeColor', 'none', ...
'FaceColor', glow_color, ...
'FaceAlpha', alpha_val, ...
'FaceLighting', 'none');
end
% Add extensive glow to rings - make it much more dramatic
n_ring_glow = 12;
for i = 1:n_ring_glow
glow_scale = 1 + i*0.15; % Extend farther
alpha_ring = 0.12 / sqrt(i); % More visible
for j = 1:size(rings, 1)
r_inner = rings(j, 1) * glow_scale;
r_outer = rings(j, 2) * glow_scale;
brightness = rings(j, 3) * 0.5 / sqrt(i);
x_inner = r_inner * cos(theta);
y_inner = r_inner * sin(theta);
x_outer = r_outer * cos(theta);
y_outer = r_outer * sin(theta);
ring_x = [x_inner, fliplr(x_outer)];
ring_y = [y_inner, fliplr(y_outer)];
ring_z = zeros(size(ring_x));
% Color gradient for ring glow
if i <= 6
ring_color = brightness * [0.9, 0.85, 0.7];
else
mix = (i - 6) / (n_ring_glow - 6);
ring_color = brightness * ((1-mix)*[0.9, 0.85, 0.7] + mix*[0.65, 0.7, 0.9]);
end
fill3(ring_x, ring_y, ring_z, ring_color, ...
'EdgeColor', 'none', ...
'FaceAlpha', alpha_ring, ...
'FaceLighting', 'none');
end
end
% Add diffuse glow particles for atmospheric effect
n_glow_particles = 8000;
glow_radius_particles = 1.5 + rand(1, n_glow_particles) * 5;
theta_glow = rand(1, n_glow_particles) * 2 * pi;
phi_glow = acos(2*rand(1, n_glow_particles) - 1);
x_glow = glow_radius_particles .* sin(phi_glow) .* cos(theta_glow);
y_glow = glow_radius_particles .* sin(phi_glow) .* sin(theta_glow);
z_glow = glow_radius_particles .* cos(phi_glow);
% Color particles based on distance - cooler colors farther out
particle_glow_colors = zeros(n_glow_particles, 3);
for i = 1:n_glow_particles
dist = glow_radius_particles(i);
if dist < 3
particle_glow_colors(i,:) = [0.9, 0.85, 0.7];
else
mix = (dist - 3) / 4;
particle_glow_colors(i,:) = (1-mix)*[0.9, 0.85, 0.7] + mix*[0.5, 0.6, 0.9];
end
end
scatter3(x_glow, y_glow, z_glow, rand(1, n_glow_particles)*2+0.5, ...
particle_glow_colors, 'filled', 'MarkerFaceAlpha', 0.05);
% Lighting setup
light('Position', [-3, -2, 4], 'Style', 'infinite', ...
'Color', [1, 1, 0.95]);
light('Position', [2, 3, 2], 'Style', 'infinite', ...
'Color', [0.3, 0.3, 0.4]);
% Camera and view settings
axis equal off;
view([-35, 25]); % Angle to match saturn_photo.jpg - more dramatic tilt
camva(10); % Field of view - slightly wider to show full halo
xlim([-8, 8]); % Expanded to show outer halo
ylim([-8, 8]);
zlim([-8, 8]);
% Material properties
material dull;
title('Saturn - Left click: Rotate | Right click: Pan | Scroll: Zoom', 'Color', 'w', 'FontSize', 12);
% Enable interactive camera controls
cameratoolbar('Show');
cameratoolbar('SetMode', 'orbit'); % Start in rotation mode
% Custom mouse controls
set(gcf, 'WindowButtonDownFcn', @mouseDown);
function mouseDown(src, ~)
selType = get(src, 'SelectionType');
switch selType
case 'normal' % Left click - rotate
cameratoolbar('SetMode', 'orbit');
rotate3d on;
case 'alt' % Right click - pan
cameratoolbar('SetMode', 'pan');
pan on;
end
end
Experimenting with Agentic AI
44%
I am an AI skeptic
0%
AI is banned at work
11%
I am happy with Conversational AI
44%
9 votes
From my experience, MATLAB's Deep Learning Toolbox is quite user-friendly, but it still falls short of libraries like PyTorch in many respects. Most users tend to choose PyTorch because of its flexibility, efficiency, and rich support for many mathematical operators. In recent years, the number of dlarray-compatible mathematical functions added to the toolbox has been very limited, which makes it difficult to experiment with many custom networks. For example, svd is currently not supported for dlarray inputs.
This link (List of Functions with dlarray Support - MATLAB & Simulink) lists all functions that support dlarray as of R2026a — only around 200 functions (including toolbox-specific ones). I would like to see support for many more fundamental mathematical functions so that users have greater freedom when building and researching custom models. For context, the core MATLAB mathematics module contains roughly 600 functions, and many application domains build on that foundation.
I hope MathWorks will prioritize and accelerate expanding dlarray support for basic math functions. Doing so would significantly increase the Deep Learning Toolbox's utility and appeal for researchers and practitioners.
Thank you.
Run MATLAB using AI applications by leveraging MCP. This MCP server for MATLAB supports a wide range of coding agents like Claude Code and Visual Studio Code.
Check it out and share your experiences below. Have fun!
GitHub repo: https://github.com/matlab/matlab-mcp-core-server
Yann Debray's blog post: https://blogs.mathworks.com/deep-learning/2025/11/03/releasing-the-matlab-mcp-core-server-on-github/
Pick a team, solve Cody problems, and share your best tips and tricks. Whether you’re a beginner or a seasoned MATLAB user, you’ll have fun learning, connecting with others, and competing for amazing prizes, including MathWorks swags, Amazon gift cards, and virtual badges.
How to Participate
- Join a team that matches your coding personality
- Solve Cody problems, complete the contest problem group, or share Tips & Tricks articles
- Bonus Round: Two top players from each team will be invited to a fun code-along event
Contest Timeline
- Main Round: Nov 10 – Dec 7, 2025
- Bonus Round: Dec 8 – Dec 19, 2025
Prizes (updated 11/19)
- (New prize) Solving just one problem in the contest problem group gives you a chance to win MathWorks T-shirts or socks each week.
- Finishing the entire problem group will greatly increase your chances—while helping your team win.
- Share high-quality Tips & Tricks articles to earn you a coveted MathWorks Yeti Bottle.
- Become a top finisher in your team to win Amazon gift cards and an invitation to the bonus round.
I'm working on training neural networks without backpropagation / automatic differentiation, using locally derived analytic forms of update rules. Given that this allows a direct formula to be derived for the update rule, it removes alot of the overhead that is otherwise required from automatic differentiation.
However, matlab's functionalities for neural networks are currently solely based around backpropagation and automatic differentiation, such as the dlgradient function and requiring everything to be dlarrays during training.
I have two main requests, specifically for functions that perform a single operation within a single layer of a neural network, such as "dlconv", "fullyconnect", "maxpool", "avgpool", "relu", etc:
- these functions should also allow normal gpuArray data instead of requiring everything to be dlarrays.
- these functions are currently designed to only perform the forward pass. I request that these also be designed to perform the backward pass if user requests. There can be another input user flag that can be "forward" (default) or "backward", and then the function should have all the necessary inputs to perform that operation (e.g. for "avgpool" forward pass it only needs the avgpool input data and the avgpool parameters, but for the "avgpool" backward pass it needs the deriviative w.r.t. the avgpool output data, the avgpool parameters, and the original data dimensions). I know that there is a maxunpool function that achieves this for maxpool, but it has significant issues when trying to use it this way instead of by backpropagation in a dlgradient type layer, see (https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/2179587-making-a-custom-way-to-train-cnns-and-i-am-noticing-that-avgpool-is-significantly-faster-than-maxpo?s_tid=srchtitle).
I don't know how many people would benefit from this feature, and someone could always spend their time creating these functionalities themselves by matlab scripts, cuDNN mex, etc., but regardless it would be nice for matlab to have this allowable for more customizable neural net training.
Edit 15 Oct 2025: Removed incorrect code. Replaced symmatrix2sym and symfunmatrix2symfun with sym and symfun respectively (latter supported as of 2024b).
The Symbolic Math Toolbox does not have its own dot and and cross functions. That's o.k. (maybe) for garden variety vectors of sym objects where those operations get shipped off to the base Matlab functions
x = sym('x',[3,1]); y = sym('y',[3,1]);
which dot(x,y)
dot(x,y)
which cross(x,y)
cross(x,y)
clearvars
x = symmatrix('x',[3,1]); y = symmatrix('y',[3,1]);
z = symmatrix('z',[1,1]);
sympref('AbbreviateOutput',false);
dot() expands the result, which isn't really desirable for exposition.
eqn = z == dot(x,y)
Also, dot() returns the the result in terms of the conjugate of x, which can't be simplifed away at the symmatrix level
assumeAlso(sym(x),'real')
class(eqn)
try
eqn = z == simplify(dot(x,y))
catch ME
ME.message
end
To get rid of the conjugate, we have to resort to sym
eqn = simplify(sym(eqn))
but again we are in expanded form, which defeats the purpose of symmatrix (et. al.)
But at least we can do this to get a nice equation
eqn = z == x.'*y
dot errors with symfunmatrix inputs
clearvars
syms t real
x = symfunmatrix('x(t)',t,[3,1]); y = symfunmatrix('y(t)',t,[3,1]);
try
dot(x,y)
catch ME
ME.message
end
Cross works (accidentally IMO) with symmatrix, but expands the result, which isn't really desirable for exposition
clearvars
x = symmatrix('x',[3,1]); y = symmatrix('y',[3,1]);
z = symmatrix('z',[3,1]);
eqn = z == cross(x,y)
And it doesn't work at all if an input is a symfunmatrix
syms t
w = symfunmatrix('w(t)',t,[3,1]);
try
eqn = z == cross(x,w);
catch ME
ME.message
end
In the latter case we can expand with
eqn = z == cross(sym(x),symfun(w)) % x has to be converted
But we can't do the same with dot (as shown above, dot doesn't like symfun inputs)
try
eqn = z == dot(sym(x),symfun(w))
catch ME
ME.message
end
Looks like the only choice for dot with symfunmatrix is to write it by hand at the matrix level
x.'*w
or at the sym/symfun level
sym(x).'*symfun(w) % assuming x is real
Ideally, I'd like to see dot and cross implemented for symmatrix and symfunmatrix types where neither function would evaluate, i.e., expand, until both arguments are subs-ed with sym or symfun objects of appropriate dimension.
Also, it would be nice if symmatrix could be assumed to be real. Is there a reason why being able to do so wouldn't make sense?
try
assume(x,'real')
catch ME
ME.message
end
Automating Parameter Identifiability Analysis in SimBiology
Is it possible to develop a MATLAB Live Script that automates a series of SimBiology model fits to obtain likelihood profiles? The goal is to fit a kinetic model to experimental data while systematically fixing the value of one kinetic constant (e.g., k1) and leaving the others unrestricted.
The script would perform the following:
Use a pre-configured SimBiology project where the best fit to the experimental data has already been established (including dependent/independent variables, covariates, the error model, and optimization settings).
Iterate over a defined sequence of fixed values for a chosen parameter.
For each fixed value, run the estimation to optimize the remaining parameters.
Record the resulting Sum of Squared Errors (SSE) for each run.
The final output would be a likelihood profile—a plot of SSE versus the fixed parameter value (e.g., k1)—to assess the practical identifiability of each model parameter.
Something that I periodically wonder about is whether an integration with the Rubi integration rules package would improve symbolic integration in Matlab's Symbolic Toolbox. The project is open-source with an MIT-licensed, has a Mathematica implementation, and supposedly SymPy is working on an implementation. Much of my intrigue comes from this 2022 report that compared the previous version of Rubi (4.16.1) against various CAS systems, including Matlab 2021a (Mupad):
While not really an official metric for Rubi, this does "feel" similar to my experience computing symbolic integrals in Matlab Symbolic Toolbox vs Maple/Mathematica. What do y'all think?
Have you ever been enrolled in a course that uses an LMS and there is an assignment that invovles posting a question to, or answering a question in, a discussion group? This discussion group is meant to simulate that experience.
The functionality would allow report generation straight from live scripts that could be shared without exposing the code. This could be useful for cases where the recipient of the report only cares about the results and not the code details, or when the methodology is part of a company know how, e.g. Engineering services companies.
In order for it to be practical for use it would also require that variable values could be inserted into the text blocks, e.g. #var_name# would insert the value of the variable "var_name" and possibly selecting which code blocks to be hidden.
For the www, uk, and in domains,a generative search answer is available for Help Center searches. Please let us know if you get good or bad results for your searches. Some have pointed out that it is not available in non-english domains. You can switch your country setting to try it out. You can also ask questions in different languages and ask for the response in a different language. I get better results when I ask more specific queries. How is it working for you?
Modern engineering requires both robust hardware and powerful simulation tools. MATLAB and Simulink are widely used for data analysis, control design, and embedded system development. At the same time, Kasuo offers a wide range of components—from sensors and connectors to circuit protection devices—that engineers rely on to build real-world systems.
By combining these tools, developers can bridge the gap between simulation and implementation, ensuring their designs are reliable and ready for deployment.
Example Use Case: Sensor Data Acquisition and Processing
- Kasuo Hardware Setup
- Select a Kasuo sensor (e.g., temperature, microphone, or motion sensor).
- Connect it to a DAQ or microcontroller board for data collection.
- Data Acquisition in MATLAB
- Use MATLAB’s Data Acquisition Toolbox to stream sensor data directly.
- Example snippet:
s = daq("ni");
addinput(s,
"Dev1", "ai0", "Voltage");
data = read(s, seconds(
5), "OutputFormat", "Matrix");
plot(data);
- Signal Processing with Simulink
- Build a Simulink model to filter noise, detect anomalies, or design control logic.
- Simulink enables real-time visualization and iterative tuning.
- Validation & Protection Simulation
- Add Kasuo’s circuit protection components (e.g., TVS diodes, surge suppressors) in the physical design.
- Use Simulink to simulate stress conditions, validating system robustness before hardware testing.
Benefits of the Workflow
- Faster prototyping with MATLAB & Simulink.
- Greater reliability by incorporating Kasuo protection devices.
- Seamless transition from model to hardware implementation.
Conclusion
Kasuo’s electronic components provide the hardware foundation for many embedded and signal processing applications. When combined with MATLAB and Simulink, engineers can design, simulate, and validate systems more efficiently—reducing risks and development time.
With AI agents dev coding on other languages has become so easy.
Im waiting for matlab to build something like warp but for matlab.
I know they have the current ai but with all respect it's rubbish compared to vibe coding tools in others sectors.
Matlab leads AI so it really should be leading this space.
Hello MATLAB Central community,
My name is Yann. And I love MATLAB. I also love Python ... 🐍 (I know, not the place for that).
I recently decided to go down the rabbit hole of AI. So I started benchmarking deep learning frameworks on basic examples. Here is a recording of my experiment:
Happy to engage in the debate. What do you think?
When you compare MATLAB Plot Gallery with matplotlib gallery, you can see that matplotlib gallery contains a lot of nice graphs which are easy to create in MATLAB but not listed in MATLAB Plot Gallery.
For example, "Data Distribution Plots" section in the MATLAB Plot Gallery includes example for pie function instead of examples for piechart and donutchart functions, etc.
mlapp being a binary is a pain point for source control. It means that you either have to:
- have hooks in your source control system to zip/unzip a mlapp. However, The Mathworks have informed users not to rely on this as the mlapp format may change.
- do all your source control in MATLAB. This is non standard behaviour. Source code and source control should be independent of each other. Web front-ends to source control systems, 3rd party source control apps, CI/CD systems and much more are extremely limited in what they can do with mlapps.
I wish an mlapp could just be a directory full of the required text/other files.
Requested to post this here from reddit.
There is no call to rescan audio devices in audioPlayerRecorder, even though PortAudio has such a call. I have a measurement environment that takes a long time to initialise. If I forget to plug in my audio device, I have to do it all over again...
Large Language Models (LLMs) with MATLAB was updated again today to support the newly released OpenAI models GPT-5, GPT-5 mini, GPT-5 nano, GPT-5 chat, o3, and o4-mini. When you create an openAIChat object, set the ModelName name-value argument to "gpt-5", "gpt-5-mini", "gpt-5-nano", "gpt-5-chat-latest", "o4-mini", or "o3".
This is version 4.4.0 of this free MATLAB add-on that lets you interact with LLMs on MATLAB. The release notes are at Release v4.4.0: Support for GPT-5, o3, o4-mini · matlab-deep-learning/llms-with-matlab
