# Multithreaded sparse matrix multiplication?

12 views (last 30 days)

Show older comments

Dear community,

I am performing several (thousands) matrix multiplications of an NxN sparse (~1-2%) matrix, let's call it B, with an NxM dense matrix, let's call it A (where M<N). N is large, as is M; on the order of several thousands.

Now, usually, matrix multiplications and most other matrix operations are implicitly parallelized in Matlab, i.e. they make use of multiple threads automatically. This appears NOT to be the case if either of the matrices are sparse (see e.g. this StackOverflow discussion and this largely unanswered MathWorks thread). This is a rather unhappy surprise to me. We can verify this by the following code:

clc; clear all;

N = 5000; % set matrix sizes

M = 3000;

A = randn(N,M); % create dense random matrices

B = sprand(N,N,0.015); % create sparse random matrix

Bf = full(B); %create a dense form of the otherwise sparse matrix B

for i=1:3 % test for 1, 2, and 4 threads

m(i) = 2^(i-1);

maxNumCompThreads(m(i)); % set the thread count available to Matlab

tic % starts timer

y = B*A;

walltime(i) = toc; % wall clock time

speedup(i) = walltime(1)/walltime(i);

end

% display number of threads vs. speed up relative to just a single thread

[m',speedup']

This produces the following output, which illustrates that there is no difference between using 1, 2, and 4 threads:

threads speedup

1.0000 1.0000

2.0000 0.9950

4.0000 1.0155

If, on the other hand, I replace B by its dense form, refered to as Bf above, I get significant speedup:

threads speedup

1.0000 1.0000

2.0000 1.8894

4.0000 3.4841

So, my question: is there any way at all to access a parallelized/threaded version of matrix operations for sparse matrices without converting them to dense form? Alternatively, is this something one might expect would be implemented in future versions of Matlab? I found some suggestion involving .mex files here, but it seems the links are dead and not very well documented/no feedback?

It seems to be a rather severe restriction of implicit parallelism functionality, since sparse matrices are abound in computationally heavy problems, and hyperthreaded functionality highly desirable in these cases.

I appreciate anyone's consideration of the this issue at any level - thanks a bunch in advance! -Thomas

##### 2 Comments

Matt J
on 15 Aug 2014

Alternatively, is this something one might expect would be implemented in future versions of Matlab?

Future relative to what? What version are you using for these tests?

### Answers (2)

Eric Sampson
on 15 Aug 2014

Carlo Monjaraz
on 23 Aug 2018

In version 2018a, Sparse matrix operations still seem single threaded...

### See Also

### Categories

### Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!