comparing 3x3 block with center pixel
1 view (last 30 days)
Show older comments
i have a matrix as shown below
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7d74/a7d74d8b3bef35c55560d2923c930a749ad7a52b" alt="Untitled.png"
i wanted to take 3x3 pixel and take 3 pixels at a time along with the center pixel,
and compare the selected 3 pixel value with the center pixel,
and if 2 or morepixel has value greater than the center pixel and i wanted to assign 1 to it else 0
So in this case i will get 0-1-1-0 and then convert the binary 0110 to its corresponding decimal value = 6
Then the next 3x3 pixel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3847e/3847ea7641ebde722f00adcd9061b5a73c0d036b" alt="Untitled1.png"
4 Comments
KALYAN ACHARJYA
on 20 Nov 2019
You did not answered the @Matt J question.
Also is the start pixel at 70 or 200?
What about boundary pixels?
Accepted Answer
Matt J
on 20 Nov 2019
Edited: Matt J
on 20 Nov 2019
Here, X is the input matrix.
result=0;
result=result+1*rot90(fkernel(rot90(X,+1)),-1);
result=result+2*rot90(fkernel(rot90(X,+2)),-2);
result=result+4*fkernel(X);
result=result+8*rot90(fkernel(rot90(X,-1)),+1);
function Y=fkernel(X)
[m,n]=size(X);
Y=nan(m-2,n-2);
for i=1:n-2
B=X(:,i:i+2);
Y(:,i)=sum(B(1:m-2,:)>=B(2:m-1,2),2)>=2;
end
end
0 Comments
More Answers (1)
KALYAN ACHARJYA
on 20 Nov 2019
Edited: KALYAN ACHARJYA
on 20 Nov 2019
Self Declaration: Odd Way but simpler
for i=2:Row-1
for j=2:Col-1
if (mat(i,j)<mat(i-1,j-1)+mat(i,j)<mat(i,j-1)+mat(i,j)<mat(i+1,j-1))=>2
data(1)=1;
else
data(1)=0;
end
if (mat(i,j)<mat(i-1,j-1)+mat(i,j)<mat(i-1,j)+mat(i,j)<mat(i-1,j+1))=>2
data(2)=1;
else
data(2)=0;
end
if (mat(i,j)<mat(i+1,j-1)+mat(i,j)<mat(i_1,j)+mat(i,j)<mat(i+1,j+1))=>2
data(3)=1;
else
data(3)=0;
end
if (mat(i,j)<mat(i-1,j+1)+mat(i,j)<mat(i,j+1)+mat(i,j)<mat(i+1,j+1))=>2
data(4)=1;
else
data(4)=0;
end
mat(i,j)=bin2dec(logical(data));
end
end
7 Comments
Jan
on 21 Nov 2019
@Matt J: You are right, modifying mat inside the loop, which uses mat as input also is not wanted. If you declare data before the loops and reset the values to 0 by data(:)=0 or if it is recreated by zeros(1,4) does not really matter. For large arrays one of the methods might be faster than the other.
Matt J
on 21 Nov 2019
@Jan: It does matter however, that you were recreating data outside the j-loop. It needs to be reset inside both loops after each (i,j) is processed.
See Also
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!